A legal thriller about a police shooting, missing bodycam footage, and a prosecutor caught between justice and political pressure. When an unarmed man dies during a traffic stop, the evidence leaves one question hanging: what happened in the ninety seconds no camera recorded?Jo Calder takes the case against Officer Derek Hollis, who says he believed Marcus Webb was reaching for a weapon. Marcus was unarmed. His mother wants answers. The department's bodycam policy required the camera to be running, yet the footage ends before the shooting. An internal review finds a use-of-force violation, but that finding is not enough to secure a criminal conviction.Jo's own office becomes part of the battle. DA Louis Bennett urges a lesser charge, wary of the police union and the political consequences. Outside the courthouse, opposing protests grow. Inside, Jo faces a harder problem: the evidence is incomplete, the legal standard favors split-second judgments, and every witness carries a different version of the same seconds.Then Jo discovers that Eleanor Vance-the attorney now directing Hollis's defense-is the lawyer who secured the acquittal of the man who killed Jo's sister decades earlier. What began as a difficult prosecution becomes personal, while quiet pressure reaches witnesses connected to the case.A partial bystander video, competing experts, a conflicted police partner, and an exact timeline force Jo to confront what can actually be proved. She must argue not what might have happened, but what the evidence establishes beyond the required burden.A courtroom thriller built around disputed evidence, police power, political pressure, divided loyalties, and the human cost of a verdict. Every frame matters. Every second can change the meaning of what came before.Because sometimes the hardest case is not proving what happened. It is proving what someone should have known.
