Tracked shipping to South Africa with premium packaging for just R199 

Ship to
South Africa
0
  • argentina
  • chile
  • colombia
  • españa
  • méxico
  • perú
  • estados unidos
  • internacional

Select your country

Americas

Europe

Rest of the world

portada The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the bar of Politics
Type
Physical Book
Year
1986
Language
English
Pages
306
Format
Paperback
Weight
1
ISBN
0300032994
ISBN13
9780300032994
Edition No.
2

The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the bar of Politics

Alexander M. Bickel (Author) · Yale University Press · Paperback

The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the bar of Politics - Alexander M. Bickel

New Book Imported to South Africa
Delivery: 16 Nov - 24 Nov Shipping: 13 to 14 business days.
R 845
R 845

Synopsis "The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the bar of Politics "

This classic book on the role of the United States Supreme Court traces the history of the Court, assessing the merits of various decisions along the way. Alexander Bickel begins with Marbury v. Madison, which he says give shaky support to judicial review, and concludes with the school desegregation cases of 1954, which he uses to show the extent and limits of the Court’s power. In this way he accomplishes his stated purpose: “to have the Supreme Court’s exercise of judicial review better understood and supported and more sagaciously used.” The book now includes a new foreword by Harry H. Wellington. Alexander Mordecai Bickel (1924-1974) was one of the most influential constitutional commentators of the twentieth century. Bickel’s most distinctive contribution to constitutional law was to stress what he called “the passive virtues” of judicial decision-making – the refusal to decide cases on substantive grounds if narrower grounds exist to decide the case. Bickel viewed “private ordering” and the voluntary working-out of problems as generally preferable to legalistic solutions. In his books Bickel attacked the Warren Court for what he saw as its misuse of history, shoddy reasoning, and sometimes arbitrary results. Bickel thought that the Warren Court’s two most important lines of decision, Brown v. Board of Education and Baker v. Carr, did not produce the results the Court had intended. In his book The Least Dangerous Branch, Bickel coined the term counter-majoritarian difficulty to describe his view that judicial review stands in tension with democratic theory. Bickel envisioned the Supreme Court as playing a statesman-like role in national controversies, engaging in dialogue with the other branches of government. Thus he did not see the Court as a purely passive body, but as one which should lead public opinion, albeit carefully.

Customers reviews

Frequently Asked Questions about the Book

All books in our catalog are Original.
The book is written in English.
The binding of this edition is Paperback.

Questions and Answers about the Book

Do you have a question about the book? Login to be able to add your own question.

Opinions about Bookdelivery

More customer reviews